IP22 1QL

Gislingham · Mid Suffolk · England

Updated September 2026

Compare this postcode

Location overview

Drag to pan. Use + or - to zoom. Open larger map
Post town
Diss
Local authority
Mid Suffolk
Constituency
Waveney Valley
Postcode district
IP22
Postcode sector
IP22 1

Nearby postcodes

Nearby postcode distances
Postcode Distance
IP22 1QN 355 m
IP22 1QJ 363 m
IP22 1QE 597 m
IP22 1PZ 717 m
IP22 1PR 771 m
Complete postcode fields and official codes
Postcode
IP22 1QL
Status
Current
Introduced
1 January 1980
Terminated
Not published
Postcode area
IP
Postcode district
IP22
Postcode sector
IP22 1
Latitude
52.344271
Longitude
1.051652
British National Grid easting
607,963
British National Grid northing
276,181

Statistical and administrative geographies

Country
England · E92000001
Region
East of England · E12000006
Local authority district
Mid Suffolk · E07000203
Parish or community
E04009183
Westminster constituency
Waveney Valley · E14001569
Output area
E00153171
Lower layer super output area
Mid Suffolk 002B · E01030054
Middle layer super output area
Mid Suffolk 002 · E02006262

Postcode source versions

Explore IP22

21 recorded sales at this postcode
Address Date Price
The Burrow, Great Green, Burgate, Diss, IP22 1QL 28 March 2025 £710,000
East Cottage, Great Green, Burgate, Diss, IP22 1QL 6 March 2025 £545,000
Ivy Cottage, Great Green, Burgate, Diss, IP22 1QL 18 November 2022 £465,000

Schools

Within 3.1 miles of this postcode

View all nearby schools
Open schools
6
Primary
6
Secondary
0
  1. Wortham Primary School

    Academy converter

    1.0 km
  2. St Botolph's Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

    Voluntary controlled school

    3.0 km
  3. Mellis Church of England Primary School

    Academy converter

    3.2 km

Recorded crime

Within 1 mile of this postcode

View all nearby crime records
Published events
9
Months covered
12
Latest month
June 2026

Most recorded categories in this period

  • Violence and sexual offences 7
  • Vehicle crime 1
  • Criminal damage and arson 1

Census 2021

Population and age profile

Postcode residents
39

20 female, 19 male

Postcode households
13
Residents per household
3.0
IP22 1 residents
5,636

Age bands in IP22 1

Wider postcode sector
Age 0 to 14
13.3%

745 residents

Age 15 to 24
8.6%

482 residents

Age 25 to 44
17.4%

979 residents

Age 45 to 64
30.8%

1,733 residents

Age 65 and over
29.9%

1,682 residents

This postcode contained 0.7% of the sector's usual residents on Census Day. The age profile describes the wider IP22 1 sector, not people in this individual postcode.

Small counts are adjusted for privacy, so totals can differ slightly between Census tables.

Census Day: 21 March 2021. Sources: ONS/Nomis P001-P004 and ONS CT21_0228. Age table version 2024-04-08.

Fixed broadband coverage

Ofcom's predicted availability across all residential and commercial premises in this postcode in January 2026.

Superfast, 30 Mbit/s+
100%
Ultrafast, 100 Mbit/s+
0%
Ultrafast, 300 Mbit/s+
0%
Gigabit-capable
0%
Unable to receive decent fixed or FWA broadband
0%
Next Generation Access
100%
Decent broadband available from fixed wireless
0%

Predicted coverage, not measured speeds. Check availability for your address with a provider. Postcode-level full-fibre figures are not published in this release.

Source: Ofcom Connected Nations Spring 2026, version 2026-01-v2. Contains Ofcom data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

GP practices

1

within 5 km

  • BOTESDALE HEALTH CENTRE

    BACK HILLS, BOTESDALE, DISS, IP22 1DW

    ODS code D83033

    3.1 km

Main GP practices only; branch surgeries are excluded. Distances are straight-line. Contact the practice to check registration, services, opening hours and appointments.

Source acquired on 2026-09-05. Contains information from NHS England, licenced under the current version of the Open Government Licence.

Nearby transport

  • Sycamore View

    BCT · Burgate

    0.3 miles
  • Sycamore View

    BCT · Burgate

    0.3 miles
  • School

    BCT · Wortham

    0.6 miles
  • School

    BCT · Wortham

    0.6 miles
  • Village Sign

    BCT · Wortham

    0.7 miles

Relative deprivation

English Indices of Deprivation 2025 for Mid Suffolk 002B, the published LSOA linked to this postcode. Decile 1 contains the most deprived 10% of English LSOAs and decile 10 the least deprived 10%.

Overall IMD decile

7 of 10

Overall England rank

21,558 of 33,755

Income
9 of 10
Employment
8 of 10
Education and skills
7 of 10
Health and disability
8 of 10
Crime
10 of 10
Housing and services
1 of 10
Living environment
2 of 10

These are relative area statistics, not measures of an individual household, affluence or absolute change. They cannot be compared with indices for other UK nations. Source: English Indices of Deprivation 2025, version 2025-v2.

Flood risk

Environment Agency long-term indicators for the area around addresses in this postcode. They are not an assessment of any individual property and do not show current or forecast flooding.

High risk addresses
3
Medium risk addresses
0
Low risk addresses
1
Groundwater flood alert area
Unlikely

Source: Environment Agency flood-risk postcode search tool data, version 2026-06-18. Check the long-term risk for an individual area. © Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2025. All rights reserved.

Evidence in context

Property market

The five-year median is £516,000 from 4 recorded sales in IP22 1QL. This is a recorded-sale statistic, not a current valuation.

The latest UK House Price Index average for Mid Suffolk is £320,276 in June 2026, up 5.8% year on year.

Schools

6 open schools are in scope, including 6 primary and 0 secondary schools. Wortham Primary School is the nearest published school at 0.6 miles.

Counts describe active establishment records. They do not assess admissions, catchments or quality.

Recorded crime

9 published events cover 12 months, averaging 0.75 events per published month. The largest recorded category is Violence and sexual offences with 7 events.

The source publishes anonymised street-level events. These figures are not a measure of safety for an individual address.